Now some motors on different cars with different designs do see some oil blow-by from time to time with the passenger side PVC/CCV but seems like their selling snake oil for $275-300.Ĭlick to expand.I don't understand. I was informed that the PVC system is the only hose involved in the blow-by recirculation process on this particular car. Seems like it would be a foolish design to force-feed oil and gas vapor into the turbo inlet. Plus the fact that this point is right in front of the passenger side turbo would be a big concern. While I had the complete intake system apart there was no trace of fluid or oil residue in my passengers side airbox boot where this crank case vent hose attaches. Since I saw the install process of the product I can relate because I just recently added the AMS intake system to my 3.0t. ![]() If it's just a vent that sucks fresh air in, then why the need to build a catch can system connecting to it? Is this just their attempt to sell more or additional product to their uninformed buyers or is there a true need to tap into the passengers side crankcase vent on the Q50/60? From me reaching out to a person in the industry, the word is the CCV side for the VR30 motor doesn't actually recircualte any moisture or oil blow-by through this hose.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |